C-Store News

C-Store News
Marketing Sales

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

C-Store News







CASE STUDY - FAMILY DOLLAR


CASE STUDY - FAMILY DOLLAR

RGIS Pilots Space Optimization Solution for Family Dollar
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Family Dollar, a successful Retail chain with more than 6,700 stores, located from Maine to Arizona, offers consumers a wide array of products, shopping convenience and everyday low prices.
PROBLEM
Family Dollar stores vary in size and product assortments. Although Family Dollar conducts store surveys on a project basis for remodels, there was a need to collect spatial data for purposes of evaluating performance and determining courses of action related to merchandise assortments and allocation of selling floor space. There was no facility for the central repository of information across the chain or a market. This created two primary challenges:
  • Evaluation of product placement and adjacencies in specific stores and formats was difficult to track and manage
  • There was limited visibility to understand and prioritize both large and small-scale space re-alignments
SOLUTION
RGIS and Family Dollar collaborated on a pilot program for the Baltimore, Maryland store locations in order to map the store planogram, determine the gap between actual fixture and product placement and the realogram and provide an accurate floor plan for fixturing and current space allocation. The objectives of the pilot included:
  • Providing an analytical platform to more effectively evaluate space allocation and layout decisions
  • Enabling faster execution through the use of improved store planning tools and fixture ordering processes – and eliminating the need to survey each specific store
In mapping the pilot stores, RGIS used Smartspace™, an innovative suite of macro space planning solutions, designed to optimize the use of available space. Specific tools included:
  • Smartspace™ StorViewer™ – a powerful space planning, reporting and collaboration tool. StorViewer™ can be utilized by all levels of an organization – from store management to the C-suite – to create chain-wide analysis, reporting and heat maps. By connecting to a central store database over the internet or company intranet, StorViewer™ allows management to evaluate specific store performance and identify improvement opportunities across the organization.
  • Smartspace™ StorPlanner™ – an intelligent retail planning and space management application. StorPlanner™ enables retailers to evaluate the effectiveness of store layouts at the individual store, within clusters/geographies or across the enterprise. The use of StorPlanner™ can result in significant productivity improvements in the management and allocation of store space.
In order to populate the Smartspace™ StorPlanner™ database, RGIS used its proprietary data collection tool to validate and update each store’s AutoCad drawing and associate planograms to each fixture section in each store.
RESULTS
Through the collaborative pilot, Family Dollar was able to gain increased visibility into the store layout, product adjacencies and opportunities for enhancing available space.
Family Dollar’s Vice President, Format and Space Management reports: “Through this pilot, we were able to gain greater intelligence about the space in our stores allowing us to make better decisions about how to use that space. With a space optimization tools StorPlanner™ and StorViewer™, we can make faster, high quality decisions to ensure our stores are easy to shop for our customers and that they’re able to find what they need quickly.”

Friday, August 26, 2011


The Pantry Announces Leadership Transition

businesswire

Related Quotes

Symbol Price Change
PTRY 12.13 +0.41
Chart for The Pantry, Inc.
{"s" : "ptry","k" : "a00,a50,b00,b60,c10,g00,h00,l10,p20,t10,v00","o" : "","j" : ""}
Press Release Source: The Pantry, Inc. On Monday August 22, 2011, 8:00 am EDT

CARY, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Pantry, Inc. (NASDAQ:PTRY - News), the leading independently operated convenience store chain in the southeastern U.S., announced today that Terrance M. Marks, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, has informed the Board of Directors of his intention to resign. The Company’s Board of Directors has formed a committee to immediately begin the search for a new CEO.


Mr. Marks will continue in his role as CEO of the Company for up to sixty days and will work with Edwin J. Holman, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, on the leadership transition. Pursuant to a plan previously adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors, upon Mr. Marks’ departure, Mr. Holman will be named and assume the position of interim CEO to serve until such time as a successor has been retained by the Company.


Mr. Marks commented, “I am very proud of our accomplishments over the last two years and I depart with great confidence in this team’s ability to continue making meaningful progress against the company’s strategic initiatives. My decision to leave was difficult, but ultimately driven by personal considerations. I was recently approached with, and accepted, an opportunity that will enable me to return to my home and family in Atlanta. I remain as enthusiastic as ever about The Pantry’s future and look forward to working with the board to assure a seamless transition.”


“The board of directors and I would like to thank Terry for his leadership and fully support the strategic initiatives he brought to the company. He will be leaving The Pantry well positioned for the future,” commented Mr. Holman.


About The Pantry


Headquartered in Cary, North Carolina, The Pantry, Inc. is the leading independently operated convenience store chain in the southeastern United States and one of the largest independently operated convenience store chains in the country. As of August 21, 2011, the Company operated 1,655 stores in thirteen states under select banners, including Kangaroo Express®, its primary operating banner. The Pantry's stores offer a broad selection of merchandise, as well as fuel and other ancillary services designed to appeal to the convenience needs of its customers.


Safe Harbor Statement


Statements made by the Company in this press release relating to future plans, events, or financial condition or performance are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of words such as “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “outlook,” ”guidance,” “believe,” “target,” “forecast”, “will,” “may” or words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements are likely to address matters such as the Company’s anticipated sales, expenses, margins, capital expenditures, profits, cash flows and liquidity, as well as our expectations relating to the costs and benefits of our merchandising and other strategic initiatives. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company's current plans and expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to vary materially from the results and events anticipated or implied by such forward-looking statements. Any number of factors could affect actual results and events, including, without limitation: the ability of the Company to find a suitable candidate for the position of CEO; the ability of the Company to retain a new CEO on mutually agreeable terms; the ability of the Company to take advantage of expected synergies in connection with acquisitions; the actual operating results of stores acquired; the Company's ability to enhance its operating performance through its in-store initiatives; fluctuations in domestic and global petroleum and fuel markets; realizing expected benefits from the Company's fuel supply agreements; changes in the competitive landscape of the convenience store industry, including fuel stations and other non-traditional retailers located in the Company's markets; the effect of national and regional economic conditions on the convenience store industry and the Company's markets; the global financial crisis and uncertainty in global economic conditions; wholesale cost increases of, and tax increases on, tobacco products; the effect of regional weather conditions and climate change on customer traffic and spending; legal, technological, political and scientific developments regarding climate change; financial difficulties of suppliers, including the Company's principal suppliers of fuel and merchandise, and their ability to continue to supply its stores; the Company's financial leverage and debt covenants; environmental risks associated with selling petroleum products; and governmental laws and regulations, including those relating to the environment. These and other risk factors are discussed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and in its other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the forward-looking statements included in this press release are based on the Company's estimates and plans as of August 22, 2011. While the Company may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, it specifically disclaims any obligation to do so.







Contact:

The Pantry, Inc.
Media Relations:
Brandon Bryce, 919-459-6451
or
Investor Relations:
Mark Bierley, 919-774-6700

Hooters of America names new president and CEO

Atlanta-based Hooters of America names new president and CEO

ap

Related Quotes

Symbol Price Change
CCE 26.38 +0.62
Chart for Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. Com
PTRY 12.13 +0.41
Chart for The Pantry, Inc.
{"s" : "cce,ptry","k" : "a00,a50,b00,b60,c10,g00,h00,l10,p20,t10,v00","o" : "","j" : ""}
On Wednesday August 24, 2011, 11:18 am EDT
ATLANTA (AP) -- Atlanta-based Hooters of America LLC has announced that Terrance M. Marks will join the restaurant company as president and CEO.
The company said in a statement that Marks was most recently president and CEO of The Pantry Inc., where he was responsible for more than 1,650 convenience stores in 13 states. Before that, he spent more than two decades at Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. in various sales, operations, finance and general management roles.
Hooters of America is a franchisor and operator of more than 435 Hooters restaurants in 44 states and 28 foreign countries.
The company said that Marks will begin his new role with Hooters early this fall.

1 Reason Pantry's Earnings Aren't So Hot

Recs

0

1 Reason Pantry's Earnings Aren't So Hot

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the “how much,” very few investors bother to ask, “How fast?”
When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it’s booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to Pantry (Nasdaq: PTRY  ) .
Let's break this downIn this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.
Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.
To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better.
Here’s the CCC for Pantry, alongside the comparable figures from a few competitors and peers.
Company
TTM Revenue
TTM CCC
 Pantry $7,934  4
 Casey’s General Stores (Nasdaq: CASY  ) $5,140  (2)
 Murphy Oil (NYSE: MUR  ) $28,616  (2)
 Delek US Holdings (NYSE: DK  ) $4,857  16
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar amounts in millions. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. TTM = trailing 12 months.
For younger, fast-growth companies, the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that’s taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies, the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). This can sometimes be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.
While I find peer comparisons useful, I’m most interested in comparing a company’s CCC to its prior performance. Here’s where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.
anImage
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.
Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period may not be strictly comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at Pantry, consult the quarterly period chart below.
anImage
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.
On a 12-month basis, the trend at Pantry looks OK. At 3.7 days, it is barely changed from the five-year average of 3.6 days. The biggest contributor to that degradation was DPO, which worsened 1.0 days when compared to the five-year average.
Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at Pantry looks OK. At 5.0 days, it is little changed from the average of the past eight quarters. Investors will want to keep an eye on this for the future to make sure it doesn't stray too far in the wrong direction. With both 12-month and quarterly CCC running worse than average, Pantry gets low marks in this cash-conversion checkup.
Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it’s definitely worth watching every quarter. You’ll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home run stocks that provide the market's best returns.
To stay on top of the CCC for your favorite companies, just use the handy links below to add companies to your free watchlist.

Worried about the end of America? Stockpiling gold and guns? Dumping financial assets and plotting a "working" farm? Seriously? Here's a better idea: Use the techniques and strategies once limited to pros and the ultra wealthy – to grow and PROTECT your wealth. It's spelled out for you in a new report, "How to Profit From the ONE 'Sure Thing' For the Second Half of 2011 – plus, three more fearless predictions." Get it FREE for a very limited time. Enter your email address now.


Seth Jayson had no position in any company mentioned here at the time of publication. You can view his stock holdings here. He is co-advisor of Motley Fool Hidden Gems, which provides new small-cap ideas every month, backed by a real-money portfolio. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Warren Buffett to invest US$5bil in Bank of America


Warren Buffett to invest US$5bil in Bank of America


NEW YORK: Warren Buffett will invest US$5bil in Bank of America Corp (BoA), stepping in to shore up the largest US bank in the same way he helped prop up Goldman Sachs and General Electric during the financial crisis.
Buffett and BoA said he made an unsolicited call to the bank on Wednesday morning offering to make an investment. Buffett told CNBC the idea came to him while taking a bath and the deal was done in 24 hours.
The deal entails Buffett’s insurance company, Berkshire Hathaway Inc, buying US$5bil of preferred shares and receiving warrants to buy 700 million shares. The warrants helped lift Berkshire Hathaway’s paper profits on the deal to more than US$3bil, although the transaction has not yet closed.
The deal is expected to close on Sept 1 and includes provisions barring Buffett from raising his total BoA stake past 14.9%. Fully exercised, at the most recent share count the warrants represent a 6.5% stake.
Even though the bank has said it did not need to raise capital, investors widely believed it needed more money and to show it could raise funds easily. Employees were also relieved by the news. On at least one BoA trading floor, traders cheered when the news crossed the wires.
BoA has been plagued by fears that bad mortgage loans and legal liabilities from loans packaged into bonds by its Countrywide unit could drag it into tens of billions of dollars in fresh losses that would stretch its capital.
The deal proved again that Berkshire Hathaway has become something of a lender of last resort to the financial system, as when it invested in Goldman Sachs Group Inc and General Electric Co. Buffett’s role in aiding the economy and the financial system has become symbolically important, given the lack of policy options left for the US government and the Federal Reserve to stimulate demand.
“This proves to the market that, if the bank needs additional capital, which we don’t believe they do, but if they needed to calm the market by raising capital, they could do it within 30 minutes with a quick call to Uncle Warren,” said Sean Egan, managing principal of Egan-Jones Ratings.
The deal comes at a cost for BoA. The US$300mil of annual dividend payments it makes will cut into earnings per share and the deal will influence its outstanding share count. — Reuters

Gold Price




gold

   
Price of Gold


Price of Gold

Gold Price

Where the world checks
the gold price™


The Most Expensive Weather Disasters in America

by Greg Emerson
Friday, August 26, 2011
provided by
mainstreet.jpg
Hurricane Irene is heading up the East Coast, bringing violent wind and rain as America’s first major storm of hurricane season. Coastal residents are racing to prepare their homes and businesses for what could be a destructive and costly storm.

More from MainStreet.com:

How to Prepare Your Money for Natural Disasters

3 Signs Layoffs Are Coming to Your Company

The Worst Roads in America

A look at the worst disasters of the past 30 years reveals 99 natural disasters whose damage costs surpassed $1 billion from 1980—2010, according to the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), which tracks natural disasters, response efforts and associated costs. There have been nine additional natural disasters already in 2011 that have topped $1 billion in damages.

Here are the 10 most expensive natural disasters to hit America. The statistics came from a variety of U.S. government agencies, state emergency management agencies and insurance industry estimates. They have all been adjusted to 2007 dollars.
Most Expensive: Hurricane Katrina, 2005


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $133.8 Billion
By far the most expensive natural disaster in U.S. history, Hurricane Katrina impacted American life in ways that are still being felt today. The hurricane first ran aground as a Category 1 storm near Miami, but strengthened to a "strong Category 3" as it moved west, hitting the Gulf Coast in several spots in Mississippi and Louisiana. The severe storm surge exceeded an estimated 25 feet in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama, and the failure of the levee system that resulted sent millions of people to higher ground. The storm took approximately 1,833 lives, and the economic costs of almost $134 billion put this disaster in a category of its own.

2nd Most Expensive: Drought/Heat Wave, 1988


Photo: USGS

Damages: $71.2 Billion
Eight years later, another drought and associated heatwave hit the central and eastern U.S., in the summer of 1988. In Pennsylvania, summer temperatures were the highest in 100 years, with 15 consecutive days of 90—degree weather in early July. The estimated 5,000—10,000 lives that were lost as a result — mostly older people who succumbed to heat stroke — are on the scale of the 1980 drought, but the economic costs for agriculture were much more severe. Estimates put losses for the heatwave at more than $71 billion.


3rd Most Expensive: Drought/Heat Wave, 1980


Photo: USGS

Damages: $55.4 Billion
It's hard to talk about the severity of the 1980 heatwave that struck the central and eastern U.S. in the summer of that year, as the estimated 10,000 deaths attributed to it (many from sand— and windstorms) go far beyond calculable costs. Numerous temperature records were set that that summer in Missouri, Tennessee and Texas, with Dallas experiencing 42 straight days of temperatures of more than 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Economic losses to agriculture and related industries came to more than $55 billion, making this the third most expensive weather disaster in recent U.S. history.

4th Most Expensive: Hurricane Andrew, 1992


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $40 Billion
Our first Category 5 hurricane on the list, Hurricane Andrew slammed into Dade County, Fla., and then weakened to a Category 3 before making landfall a second time in Louisiana in August 1992. The massive winds destroyed more than 25,000 homes and damaged more than 100,000 more, causing about $40 billion in losses, as well as 61 deaths — 23 of which were attributed directly to the disaster, the rest coming from its after—effects.




5th Most Expensive: Midwest Flooding, 1993


Photo: Missouri Highway and Transportation Department

Damages: $30.2 Billion
Heavy rains in the summer of 1993 caused severe flooding in the central states that claimed 48 human lives in addition to the more than $30 billion in economic costs. The damage was worst along the Mississippi river in Missouri, which experienced record flooding — levels hit 19.6 feet above flood stage in St. Louis. Record levels were also measured for the Missouri (reaching 17.5 feet above flood stage in Kansas City) and Kansas rivers (reaching 22 feet above flood stage). The flooding also left Des Moines without water for 12 days, the largest American city to go without water for so long.


6th Most Expensive: Hurricane Ike, 2008


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $27 Billion
Texas was again the victim in 2008 when Hurricane Ike, a Category 2 hurricane, made landfall in Galveston in September after having passed over Cuba as a Category 3. The storm surge of up to 13 feet caused flooding that extended from Galveston to Louisiana and the other coastal states, and the damage done to offshore oil rigs, pipelines, and refineries caused significant fuel shortages that placed the damage from the storm at around $27 billion. What's more, 112 deaths were credited to the storm when the dozens of missing people after the event were accounted for; most of the victims were in Texas.

7th Most Expensive: Hurricane Rita, 2005


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $17.1 Billion
Hurricane Rita — hit the southern coasts of Texas and Louisiana in September 2005. While in the Gulf of Mexico it reached Category 5, and while it slowed before hitting land, the powerful storm surge and high winds caused the same amount of monetary damage as Wilma. But the toll in human lives was significantly higher: 119 people died from the storm, and most were deemed indirect deaths related to evacuations rather than the storm itself (car accidents, crimes, fires, illness, etc.).



8th Most Expensive: Hurricane Wilma, 2005


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $17.1 Billion
While the Gulf Coast was still reeling from massive Hurricane Rita (see next slide) and Hurricane Katrina (later slide), Hurricane Wilma hit southwest Florida as a Category 3 hurricane in October 2005, during the most active hurricane season since 1933. While out to sea it reached Category 5 strength and recorded the lowest pressure ever in the Atlantic basin, though it weakened a bit before making landfall. Still, it decimated parts of Mexico's Yucatan peninsula, flooded parts of Havana, Cuba, and eventually caused severe flooding in southern Florida that caused more than $17 billion in damages and claimed an estimated 35 lives.

9th Most Expensive: Hurricane Charley, 2004


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $16.5 Billion
Just one month before Hurricane Ivan, Hurricane Charley — a more intense, Category 4 storm — hit the coast of Florida in August and caused more than $16 billion in damages. The destruction was mostly confined to Florida, where 25 of the state's 67 counties were declared federal disaster areas. The Carolinas also sustained some damage as Charley tracked up the East Coast, making its final landfall on Long Island as a tropical storm. The toll in human life reached 35.



10th Most Expensive: Hurricane Ivan, 2004


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $15.4 Billion
In September 2004, a Category 3 hurricane hit the coast of Alabama, causing flooding and intense wind damage in Alabama, Florida and a number of southern states, as more than 100 tornadoes were reported inland. In addition to damages in the billions of dollars, Hurricane Ivan claimed at least 57 lives in the U.S., with 72 additional fatalities in the Caribbean, where the storm damaged 90% of the houses on Grenada and "nearly every building" on Grand Cayman, according to the NCDC report.

___ America

by Greg Emerson
Friday, August 26, 2011
provided by
mainstreet.jpg
Hurricane Irene is heading up the East Coast, bringing violent wind and rain as America’s first major storm of hurricane season. Coastal residents are racing to prepare their homes and businesses for what could be a destructive and costly storm.

More from MainStreet.com:

How to Prepare Your Money for Natural Disasters

3 Signs Layoffs Are Coming to Your Company

The Worst Roads in America

A look at the worst disasters of the past 30 years reveals 99 natural disasters whose damage costs surpassed $1 billion from 1980—2010, according to the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), which tracks natural disasters, response efforts and associated costs. There have been nine additional natural disasters already in 2011 that have topped $1 billion in damages.

Here are the 10 most expensive natural disasters to hit America. The statistics came from a variety of U.S. government agencies, state emergency management agencies and insurance industry estimates. They have all been adjusted to 2007 dollars.
Most Expensive: Hurricane Katrina, 2005


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $133.8 Billion
By far the most expensive natural disaster in U.S. history, Hurricane Katrina impacted American life in ways that are still being felt today. The hurricane first ran aground as a Category 1 storm near Miami, but strengthened to a "strong Category 3" as it moved west, hitting the Gulf Coast in several spots in Mississippi and Louisiana. The severe storm surge exceeded an estimated 25 feet in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama, and the failure of the levee system that resulted sent millions of people to higher ground. The storm took approximately 1,833 lives, and the economic costs of almost $134 billion put this disaster in a category of its own.

2nd Most Expensive: Drought/Heat Wave, 1988


Photo: USGS

Damages: $71.2 Billion
Eight years later, another drought and associated heatwave hit the central and eastern U.S., in the summer of 1988. In Pennsylvania, summer temperatures were the highest in 100 years, with 15 consecutive days of 90—degree weather in early July. The estimated 5,000—10,000 lives that were lost as a result — mostly older people who succumbed to heat stroke — are on the scale of the 1980 drought, but the economic costs for agriculture were much more severe. Estimates put losses for the heatwave at more than $71 billion.


3rd Most Expensive: Drought/Heat Wave, 1980


Photo: USGS

Damages: $55.4 Billion
It's hard to talk about the severity of the 1980 heatwave that struck the central and eastern U.S. in the summer of that year, as the estimated 10,000 deaths attributed to it (many from sand— and windstorms) go far beyond calculable costs. Numerous temperature records were set that that summer in Missouri, Tennessee and Texas, with Dallas experiencing 42 straight days of temperatures of more than 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Economic losses to agriculture and related industries came to more than $55 billion, making this the third most expensive weather disaster in recent U.S. history.

4th Most Expensive: Hurricane Andrew, 1992


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $40 Billion
Our first Category 5 hurricane on the list, Hurricane Andrew slammed into Dade County, Fla., and then weakened to a Category 3 before making landfall a second time in Louisiana in August 1992. The massive winds destroyed more than 25,000 homes and damaged more than 100,000 more, causing about $40 billion in losses, as well as 61 deaths — 23 of which were attributed directly to the disaster, the rest coming from its after—effects.




5th Most Expensive: Midwest Flooding, 1993


Photo: Missouri Highway and Transportation Department

Damages: $30.2 Billion
Heavy rains in the summer of 1993 caused severe flooding in the central states that claimed 48 human lives in addition to the more than $30 billion in economic costs. The damage was worst along the Mississippi river in Missouri, which experienced record flooding — levels hit 19.6 feet above flood stage in St. Louis. Record levels were also measured for the Missouri (reaching 17.5 feet above flood stage in Kansas City) and Kansas rivers (reaching 22 feet above flood stage). The flooding also left Des Moines without water for 12 days, the largest American city to go without water for so long.


6th Most Expensive: Hurricane Ike, 2008


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $27 Billion
Texas was again the victim in 2008 when Hurricane Ike, a Category 2 hurricane, made landfall in Galveston in September after having passed over Cuba as a Category 3. The storm surge of up to 13 feet caused flooding that extended from Galveston to Louisiana and the other coastal states, and the damage done to offshore oil rigs, pipelines, and refineries caused significant fuel shortages that placed the damage from the storm at around $27 billion. What's more, 112 deaths were credited to the storm when the dozens of missing people after the event were accounted for; most of the victims were in Texas.

7th Most Expensive: Hurricane Rita, 2005


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $17.1 Billion
Hurricane Rita — hit the southern coasts of Texas and Louisiana in September 2005. While in the Gulf of Mexico it reached Category 5, and while it slowed before hitting land, the powerful storm surge and high winds caused the same amount of monetary damage as Wilma. But the toll in human lives was significantly higher: 119 people died from the storm, and most were deemed indirect deaths related to evacuations rather than the storm itself (car accidents, crimes, fires, illness, etc.).



8th Most Expensive: Hurricane Wilma, 2005


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $17.1 Billion
While the Gulf Coast was still reeling from massive Hurricane Rita (see next slide) and Hurricane Katrina (later slide), Hurricane Wilma hit southwest Florida as a Category 3 hurricane in October 2005, during the most active hurricane season since 1933. While out to sea it reached Category 5 strength and recorded the lowest pressure ever in the Atlantic basin, though it weakened a bit before making landfall. Still, it decimated parts of Mexico's Yucatan peninsula, flooded parts of Havana, Cuba, and eventually caused severe flooding in southern Florida that caused more than $17 billion in damages and claimed an estimated 35 lives.

9th Most Expensive: Hurricane Charley, 2004


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $16.5 Billion
Just one month before Hurricane Ivan, Hurricane Charley — a more intense, Category 4 storm — hit the coast of Florida in August and caused more than $16 billion in damages. The destruction was mostly confined to Florida, where 25 of the state's 67 counties were declared federal disaster areas. The Carolinas also sustained some damage as Charley tracked up the East Coast, making its final landfall on Long Island as a tropical storm. The toll in human life reached 35.



10th Most Expensive: Hurricane Ivan, 2004


Photo: NOAA

Damages: $15.4 Billion
In September 2004, a Category 3 hurricane hit the coast of Alabama, causing flooding and intense wind damage in Alabama, Florida and a number of southern states, as more than 100 tornadoes were reported inland. In addition to damages in the billions of dollars, Hurricane Ivan claimed at least 57 lives in the U.S., with 72 additional fatalities in the Caribbean, where the storm damaged 90% of the houses on Grenada and "nearly every building" on Grand Cayman, according to the NCDC report.
___ 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Wcwa Carwash


WCA just concluded their third successful Regional Roadshow and Car Wash Tour visiting six different car washes and a special treat at the Auto Club Speedway. A huge thanks to all participating car washes, sponsors and attendees!
animoto.com
WCA Roadshow and Car Wash Tour

Enhanced by Zemanta

Pantry Retail Executive Moves of 2011: Retail's Revolving Door


Retail Executive Moves of 2011: Retail's Revolving Door

Stock quotes in this article:WMTHDCVSLOWGPSJCPSHLD 
NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- It has been a game of executive musical chairs in the retail industry since the beginning of the new year.
So far in 2011, there have been more than two dozen changes in the executive ranks at publicly held retailers.
The moves come, not coincidentally, on the heels of the recession, as retailers have stood on the sidelines amid the downturn, not wanting to make changes at the top. Instead they rode out the recession with familiar faces in the corner office, says Howard Gross, managing director at Boyden, an executive search firm.
But now, the return of the consumer and overall improvement in the market, there is an opportunity for those companies that get it right, says Leslie Berglass, chairman of the executive search firm bearing his name. This has created a pent-up demand for talent.
The key for these firms is finding the right leaders for a changing retail business model. Those at the top now have to run an integrated business that is both global and digital, Berglass says.
Meanwhile, with most chief executives of retailers over the age of 55, the sector must find a way to incorporate a contemporary mindset -- which makes finding the right C-level executives under the CEO especially important right now.
Here then is our running -- and constantly updated -- look at recent executive shake-ups at the top retailers...

Enhanced by Zemanta